Arvin Ash’s channel is “Who Gives a bleep?” where he answers complex questions simply, in short videos of 15 minutes (updated) or less.
Arvin will challenge your beliefs by showing you the world as it really is and not as you think it might be. His answers are based on science, logic, and known facts. ‘
‘
New videos are added once a week. Subscribe to be the first to be informed.
I just saw your video about we are the only intelligent life species in the universe. David R Hawkins a spiritual master also proved it as absolute truth. I wonder if you ever heard of him? Thank you for your work !
Just watched delayed choice quantum eraser, you asked if you know how this works you get s Nobel prize. I think CS Lewis cracked it one of his books. It was in relation to the habitation of God, a place he called a “boundless present”. A concept beyond our comprehension, but a concept “delayed choice quantum eraser”, actually seems to experimentally confirm. The future is not actually changing the present. How large is our actual present? It seems it’s the space between an infinite past and an infinite future. Yet we know the future is non existant until it becomes the present. And the past has already passed into non existence. So how does one find existence sandwiched between two planes of non existence. So all that exists, exists in a present so small it can’t be
measured? Or conversely CS Lewis was right, and all that exists, exists in a present that’s boundless. Unhappily for us, such a present is not one we can perceive with the 5 limited senses God gave us with which to navigate it.
Dear Mr. Ash, Just watched delayed choice quantum eraser, you asked if you know how this works you get s Nobel prize. I think CS Lewis cracked it one of his books. It was in relation to the habitation of God, a place he called a “boundless present”. A concept beyond our comprehension, but a concept “delayed choice quantum eraser”, actually seems to experimentally confirm. The future is not actually changing the present. How large is our actual present? It seems it’s the space between an infinite past and an infinite future. Yet we know the future is non existant until it becomes the present. And the past has already passed into non existence. So how does one find existence sandwiched between two planes of non existence. So all that exists, exists in a present so small it can’t be
measured? Or conversely CS Lewis was right, and all that exists, exists in a present that’s boundless. Unhappily for us, such a present is not one we can perceive with the 5 limited senses God gave us with which to navigate it.
Hey Arvin,
Yu & Nicolic’s consciousnesses observer debunk theory has a flaw.
They record the collapse of a probability wave using an atom – which the researchers review at what they propose is a reasonable time after the conclusion of the experiment so as not to effect the outcome.
Ergo, they conclude that human consciousness played no part in the outcome as proven by delay in their review of the recording.
Ergo the proof relies on time/delay.
Meanwhile both the double slit and delayed quantum eraser experiments prove that time/delay are of no consequence.
E.g. The time difference between a wave passing thru the slits, passing the detector, hitting the target and back to before it passed thru the slits is effectively nothing.
So adding on the time taken to record the detector results then delay looking at the recording effectively does nothing.
At the end of the day, a human consciousness still observed an experiment which, in part, proves that time is of no consequence to the subject matter, therefore the time of the human observation is of no consequence.
Just dayin’ 😀
Cheers from downunder. Great channel.
Excellent material making difficult science easier to understand.
Most of what the science is saying is supported in Kabbalah.
Contact me if interested.
Arvin, I subscribe to your YouTube. Excellent stuff. Please watch the recent Eric Weinstein on joe Rogan and dive into all the craziness he talks about: geometry theory, octonians, c-elegans.
Thanks
Dan
Regarding your youtube presentation “Superconsciousness: Is the universe a conscious mind?”
I would like to draw your attention to the work of Paola Zizzi (Italy), who is involved in loop quantum gravity. She apparently calculated that the universe had the necessary amount of information/data/bits (?) to become conscious after the Big Bang. The universe could have come from nothing, grew exponentially (inflation) and reach a critical point, acquire some kind of primordial consciousness thus allowing it (the universe) to “make a decision” to “design itself”. I would love to watch a video from you that examines and explain this in more detail, you are very good at clarifying complex problems with a few words and THANK YOU for that!!!
how about a little bio, Arvin Ash? Are you an autodidact, do you hold 5 degrees, or what? Couldn’t find anything. Just a little info, not much. What you do is remarkable!
Thanks my friend. Not 5, but I do have 3 degrees, two engineering degrees and and MBA. I also have 2 years of medical school. I taught classical and advanced physics as a grad student. I sometimes stay up late at night trying to figure out the nature of reality.
I recently discovered your channel and I love it.! You dive straight into Q&A and explain what most people (like me) don’t understand. My father is an astrophysicist and a Senior Systems Engineer. I definitely read reputable sources in this field and understand quite a bit, however, I have a tricky question!
Black holes and white holes. Could the combination of the the (at a quantum level) create the big bang?
What is the difference between a white hole and a black hole?
Black holes (when approached) create further time dilation. Shouldn’t white wholes?
Black holes allow us to move forward in time (time is “entropy”)
I guess my question is, how does a white hole work and could black holes and white hole formed the universe within quantum mechanics?
Every time I discuss science with my dad, he changes the subject.
Ah, another agnostic techno-geek like myself. But unlike me you have the motivation and ability to create top-notch informational videos. Thanks! I recently subscribed and am going through some of your repertoire. Did you do a video about how alive stuff comes from not-alive stuff? Also how complexity develops in a place where ever increasing disorder is a law? Two topics that bug me.
I have not done those topics. And they were not on my list, so I will add them. Thank you for the suggestions, and thank you for watching!
I have experienced slow motion a few times usually split seconds before and during a motorcycle accident (s).(conscious state).
Like a dream that seems to take hours in real time a few seconds.(sub-conscious state).
Every experience was in real time max.3 seconds in my fully aware state of mind seemed to take forever. which at the end of 3 seconds I escaped without a scratch on multiple occasions. And also the transition from slow motion to real time is like coming outta warp drive and find myself physically and mentally exhausted!
Do you think it possible for the sub-conscious to be active while your conscious? Causing this slow motion effect?
Thanks
Philip King Hicks
53 yrs old
I was wondering if you could do a video about whether or not the center of the earth is weightless. It has already been proven that an object of fixed weight (mass) does indeed weigh less, the deeper into the earth you go . A deep underground mine was used for the experiment on YouTube. So, does that mean the center of our planet has zero g? Thank you. I love your videos!
Interesting suggestion. Thanks you.
What you describe is interesting. I am not sure how or why you are experiencing this. I highly recommend you consult your doctor.
Hi Arvin,
Great work, and you have inspired me to ask you a question.
Does light have weight?
That’s a great question! The answer is that although light has no REST mass, it does have weight. What? How can this be? Insofar as light is a form of energy, it will have RELATIVISTIC mass – due to Einstein’s famous equation E=MC^2. That is, energy and mass are equivalent. And energy does have relativistic mass which means that it will distort space-time, which means that it will have gravitational weight.
I am not disputing the video, “Are We Alone In The Universe? Likely Yes And Here’s Why”. But one question puzzles me. You talk about the tree dwelling apes in East Africa, who were forced to leave the trees, to search for food, because of the drought. But what bothers me is that, to the best of my knowledge, all other apes have 48 chromosomes and we have 46. How did this come about?
All modern apes (including us) share a common ancestor. The apes I am talking about in the video were not necessarily the same ones that gave rise to modern apes. The common ancestor of modern apes and humans may have diverged as species before this time. Regarding the chromosome disparity, human chromosome 2 is a fusion of two different chromosomes that remained separate in modern apes (2a and 2b). As to why this fusion occurred in humans, it must have given ancient humans some kind of advantage in either survival or reproduction. I am not sure whether this is settled science as yet.
Our galaxy is moving through space, so why isn’t light red shifted in one direction or another?
Not sure what you mean. The galaxies that we observe from earth are red shifted.
In your youtube clip on entanglement could you please say whether the splitting of the photons going through the lower slot occurred before or after their entangled pairs were detected at detector 1? Or is the result the same whether before or after?
Sat, Nov 23.And the only thing that may make this universe unique is that you are in it and I my friend I am glad that you are.
Thank you Arvin. Love your videos. I’m curious if you have or will be tackling the Origin of life in the near future? I have personally been hyperfocused on the Origin of Life topic for years and have been fortunate enough to have the opportunity to discuss with a few of the leading researchers in the field but I would love to see differing opinions. The consensus, from my limited research, and the few discussions mentioned above is that the prebiotic ocean, geothermal vents and spontaneous formation of molecules adapt to produce proteins/RNA and ultimately DNA is astronomically improbable which I assume most would agree but so far I haven’t seen anyone suggest an Origin of Life theory that’s worth digging into. Hoping this may at least get onto your whiteboard for possible future topics, can’t think of one more important.
Chemically, organically we are all the same. We could be placed in several bottles of the exact elements. Our bodies basically function in the same way. Why then do we have different answers to the same questions? Why do we have different thoughts? Why would my mind that is made up of the same matter as yours with the same electrical impulses like and dislike differently? We are all truly biological organisms, but why do we behave and act differently? Is there our biological being and something else that separates us? While our elements recycle, what happens to the whatever that makes us different? Scientifically we can track our chemical elements after we die, why can’t we track the energy that made us unique?
Arvin please check out this video about alternate universe where NDE by Anita moorjani talks about a parallel universe.
I hope you will watch this. Please watch it. Whatever science says it is been witnessed.
Also please watch her testimony in shadona, ARizona for more detail. Can you Please email me if u watched it ?
Thanks
I beleive it is @20:25 ( about parallel universe)
https://youtu.be/gWf8V1PXN-k
Regarding the double slit experiment, I’m curious about a few points.
1. Was the power of the recording device ever turned on but the device set to DON’T RECORD? if so, what happened?
2. Did the recording device itself emit any electromagnetic radiation, etc., that could have caused the collapse of the wavelengths?
I would like to put in a friend request on Facebook. James Michael Feinstein, Sunnyvale, California, 650-739-5997.
1. Why is the Andromeda galaxy moving toward us, while all other galaxies are moving away. Could this lead to a closer answer to what Dark Energy and Dark matter really are?
2. Could there be another universe composed, mostly, of anti matter?
3. We only began sending out radio waves a little over a century ago. If, hypothetically, the conditions were right, somewhere else for super intelligent life, could we detect it, if more than 150 light years away.
I just watched your video on quantum mechanics. I am excited by your short scientific explanations of these deep subjects. I have been listening to, and reading Sean Carrolls work. I am guessing you might be familiar. He wants to toss out the Copenhagen interpretation and replace it with the Many Worlds interpretation of quantum everything, mechanics, fields, etc. I am not a scientist. I know very little math. I am trying, now in retirement, to grasp the concepts. I am curious to know your thinking of the Many Worlds interpretation. It makes sense to me. There’s just the Schrodinger equation and nothing else. Simple and elegant. No mysterious “observation”.
I looked at your video – no I didn’t actually look at it: the video with the prism and the rainbow colors – you drew it wrong!! The colored light doesn’t exit in that direction; it goes down, Not up. Everybody knows this, except you. The light bends away from the apex of the prism, The opposite of how you show it. You’re confusing your victims. Why do you think you can teach people things! Be nice.
You recently released a video entitled something like Covid19 alarmist view. You were convinced the math was right. Would you be willing to answer a series of questions to validate the math?. My first question is:. You were taking a multiplication factor for number of cases for the next day. Start with the assumption that the number is valid and deterministic. Surely you can’t say that the number for tomorrow is deterministic. You must be using some kind of probability math to get that next day’s number. Statistically, then, what is that next day’s number called?
[ This Universe Exist Because Of Disturbance]
Like in numbers a number has value if it is greater than 0 or less than 0
Like -2,-1 has value and +1,+2 also has value
But 0 has no value
If we combine (-1) and (+1)
It becomes zero
(-1)+(+1)=0
It happens same in the universe
It is proved that for every matter there is an antimatter
It is found in protons there are
upquarks and antiupquarks
Strange quarks and antistrange quarks
In the proton atom these quarks and antiquarks forms and destroys simultaneously
No one knows why after being destroyed they again forms inside a proton and the same process is continued forever
So if we see there is two opposite parts in the universe
If everything is combined it is anilated and there will be left nothing
So some kind of disturbance is separating the two opposite and thus enabaling them to exist
Otherwise everything will be combined and destroyed completely.
So disturbance is causing everything to exist
In the universe formation same amount of antimatter and same amount of matter is formed because of some disturbance
But no one knows where the all the antimatter is gone
If antimatter would be there the nothing would be there 0.
So without disturbance nothing exist
What is that disturbance separating the two?
Sorry, now I have added some more part in the bottom
[ This Universe Exist Because Of Disturbance]
Like in numbers a number has value if it is greater than 0 or less than 0
Like -2,-1 has value and +1,+2 also has value
But 0 has no value
If we combine (-1) and (+1)
It becomes zero
(-1)+(+1)=0
It happens same in the universe
It is proved that for every matter there is an antimatter
It is found in protons there are
upquarks and antiupquarks
Strange quarks and antistrange quarks
In the proton atom these quarks and antiquarks forms and destroys simultaneously
No one knows why after being destroyed they again forms inside a proton and the same process is continued forever
So if we see there is two opposite parts in the universe
If everything is combined it is anilated and there will be left nothing
So some kind of disturbance is separating the two opposite and thus enabaling them to exist
Otherwise everything will be combined and destroyed completely.
So disturbance is causing everything to exist
In the universe formation same amount of antimatter and same amount of matter is formed because of some disturbance
But no one knows where the all the antimatter is gone
If antimatter would be there the nothing would be there 0.
So without disturbance nothing exist
What is that disturbance separating the two?
In quantum field theory it is proved
That all particles are just made of ripples in different fields
These ripples are disturbances caused in the field
Arvin,
As a Pole, I appreciate you mentioning the power of the Polish Vodka in your last great video on CoV, however, the point is exaggerated. No major manufacturer makes more than 40-50%, a far cry from the 65% threshold. There are many home made mixtures, however. If you are looking for something strong and common, I would suggest the Balkan Rakia.
The brand of Polish vodka I was referring to is Spirytus vodka.
Look at the spectrum of light it goes through the prism.
I will be interviewing Sean Carroll shortly. I have some problems with MWI. My main problem with it is that it replaces the mystery of wave collapse with the mystery of near infinite branching of reality.
Does a neutron have a gravitational field?
Is gravity definable at the subatomic, atomic or even the molecular level?
If not, at what scale of length does gravity become definable?
Is gravity the macroscopic residual effect of the other known forces?
Can one add mass to Maxwell’s equations to see what the effect of electromagnetic forces have on the macroscopic scale?
Kindly list out in detail Einstein’s discoveries and his contribution to other scientists . Kindly refer to the URL:
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/einstein-fantasy-physics_b_4948045,
Should Einstein Have Won 7 Nobel Prizes?
You might enjoy reading these two books:
1. The Reality of ESP by Russell Targ of Stanford University
2. The End to Upside Down Thinking by Mark Gober
(This Hindu religion, considered one of the oldest religions, states in their Holy Books that one’s
consciousness is separate from one’s body and not a product of the brain. When one dies the
brain dies but, one’s consciousness continues to exist. Some teaching in Hinduism point to the reincarnation ending cycle as the point where your own consciousness has reached an enlightened point where it will join the ‘Universal Consciousness.’
Hii sir this is shubham Kaushik from india
I made a video which is a copy of your video in Hindi (indian mother language ) i am going to share my video with u if you have any Copyright issue please tell i will delete it completely
I like your all video very much so i just think to recreation of that video but i am feeling guilty with out talking your permission. I m not feeling well. Before making it i should take your permission. If you allow me to make all your video in hindi i can do because in india people like these kind of stuff more. Would you allow me to collaboration with you please tell me.otherwise if you say i can delete it instantly
Video link is here.
https://youtu.be/eoi8_o2X7hQ
Thank you Mr. Arvin AshFIELD
in your skull you have a WORLD TREASURE
you should have
Secret Service Guards team 24/7
Spaciba Balshoya
Thank you Mr. Arvin AshFIELD
in your skull you have a WORLD TREASURE
you should have
Secret Service Guards team 24/7
Spaciba Balshoya
Help with Gravity.
I have a question about the visual representation of gravity using a rubber sheet.
If I have a heavy central object in the middle of the rubber sheet and an object is set to go by it then the object would dip below it’s plane as it goes by. I’m thinking this does not happen is real space/time.
Is this dip just because it’s a 2D representation? Thank!
Question on Entropy:
In the far far future of the universe, when all stars are gone and the black hole have evaporated. Does entropy reach a maximum or reset to zero? Or, does the expanding photon ‘bubble’ that’s left just require more information to describe each photon’s locations and direction of travel?
I hope this is not a dumb question.
I love your videos!
Thanks,
Gary H.
Oops. I should have finished watching your video on this entropy subject before posting questions. Sometime my brain rushes to find answers right in the middle for learning.
Thanks again,
Gary H.
Are the 4 fundamental forces and the 4 fundamental fields unified in such a way that a single force belongs to a single field?
Can you do a video on Stephen Wolfram’s physics project?
https://writings.stephenwolfram.com/2020/04/finally-we-may-have-a-path-to-the-fundamental-theory-of-physics-and-its-beautiful/
Thanks for your excellent content!
Dear Mr.Ash,
I am not educated in physics, and are probably stating already obvious things but I still want to share some thoughts about the principles of the Quantum Eraser.
If we have bag of colored marbles it is rather easy to say what gives each marble its own uniqueness, say identity. If we have a bag of marbles which are all the same, with all molecules arranged in exactly the same way, we know that this are different marbles but we can only count them so what makes them still have identity? Do the marbles lose identity completely if you keep on making more and more physical properties the same?
Photons exists without a concept of time, travel as far as they “know” immediately and always in a straight line. As information packets, time has no influence. But what makes a photon differ from another photon, what makes it a ‘being’? How basic it is, it must have some kind of unique ‘identity’. Lets call it a GUID (Global Unique Identifier, as is computer systems). So assume photons (all particles?) have a GUID, which differentiates them from one another.
What is happening in the beam splitter is that its copies the photon’s GUID so the copy IS the SAME photon (=information packet) . You cannot say that the split photons are called photon A en the other photon B, they are one and the same.
As we saw before the photon has no notion of time (past/future) whatever will happen to its “counterpart” will happen now to “the other”.
Ponder … Would you do show on this or throw it as a question to a cosmologist?
Assume the following are true.
1. Space will continue to expand Faster than light until nothing but black holes exist so far apart they cannot be detected from any other black hole.
2. Spacetime expansion rate is exponential to any single point of space time (expansion at the Planck length level).
3. The final temperature of spacetime is zero.
4. Black holes at end of life (one Planck length) become white holes of one planck length with all black hole energy/ mass
5. A Whitehole was the big bang.
6. To any observer of a single white hole it would appear to be one infinite universe.
Then the universe (multiverse?) would constantly regenerate with minor variations due to quantum shenanigans and with no loss of information.
Still no answer to “before” the beginning/first loop.
It is on my list.
Possibly…If there is an underlying particle that mediates all the forces. But this does not seem plausible from what is known currently. If strings are the ultimate structure of all things, then this may be the link.
Yes, see the animation at 8:10 of the General Relativity video for a more accurate depiction.
Is there such a thing,
as for 2 different time periods far apart to see the same object/event within the object/event time/dimension frame,
So from both time periods, able to watch this object/event as its happening
to understand how gravity relates into the quantum field ,we must include space time as a quamtize particle
Arvin Ash could you please explain the concept of magnetism. How are magnets formed in atomic level? and how do they attract other magnetic particles? also how do current produce magnetic field?
I have one suggestion which I think can improve your video quality. If possible use only graphics when speaking rather than you appearing in video.
See how “Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell” on YouTube. In their content we only hear the narrator and watch graphics.
You are doing great job. All the best!
Hello Arvin, you are really putting out some quality content! Really going against the stream of easy instant gratification. Is there a way to support you with a one time donation for those who cannot commit to becoming a patreon?
need to tell you something that happened to me it was in August or September I can’t remember of 2016. I was all alone in a New York City apartment and it was about 8 in the evening. I was wide awake in the bedroom putting some DVDs on a shelf, all the lights in the apartment were on and a DVD was playing in the kitchen. before I continue I want to mention the experience I’ve had many times in my life of feeling a tap on my shoulder or hearing my name called and turning around and nobody’s there. From what I’ve read I understand this is a very common phenomenon for many people. Those experiences I always told myself it was my imagination. However this particular night I felt the hand come down and rest on my left shoulder and I heard my name being called. The voice sounded disguised I couldn’t recognize it. I got such a chill down my spine because I knew I was going to turn around and nobody was going to be there. And sure enough nobody was there. Then something told me to look to my right and not four feet from me was a dark figure. it was completely black I couldn’t make out any detail I couldn’t tell you if it was a man or woman it look like they were wearing a coat and a knitted hat. It was definitely a person with legs arms a head in a body. Then the person became one-dimensional and started to move really fast like you could actually see the molecular structure breaking apart like static into a swirl. Then they completely ran towards the wall and disappeared. I said to myself I’m not going to be afraid there’s a logical explanation. At the time the first thing that entered my mind with somebody from another dimension but I’ve been studying physics for the last couple of months and now I’ve learned about parallel worlds. Not only that the person knew me because they knew my name it wasn’t my mother she was dead for years and my father was away in the hospital. I don’t believe in ghosts or shadow people or spirits or guardian Angels or even an all-powerful God. and I’m not superstitious and I’m not afraid of anything. I only told the story to a select few people and they either don’t believe me which I can tell or they don’t really know what to say because they don’t know the topic. I know what I saw and I know what I felt and I know what I heard. I believe it was me this all happened within 5 seconds. But those are five seconds I’m never going to forget. that’s why I had to study physics I had to understand what happened even if nobody else believes me and I haven’t been able to find any other accounts by anybody else the same as mine. most of the accounts are either where they went someplace else or some strange person came and said they were from someplace and they couldn’t find where they were from like the man from torrid story. I would be curious to know what you have to say about this experience. apparently they planned on visiting me and they couldn’t stay vexry long otherwise we might have had a nice conversation.
I just saw your video ‘Why do atoms from molecules? The quantum physics of chemical bonds explained.’
The video was very notable in the things it didn’t explain. The word ‘quantum’ or Schrödinger are used as a catch-all corollary for “it’s all magic”. By its nature quantum-anything explains very little because fundamentally it is a statistical result, not a driving potential. The electron doesn’t calculate probabilities before it decides its bonding intent. In fact the reality is — the electron has very little choice how it interacts with the neighbouring atoms, without this restriction, chemical bonding would not be repeatable.
The video is very much a ‘Wizard of Oz’ explanation — as long as you don’t look behind the curtain.
For instance ‘quantum’/Schrödinger can’t explain from first principles:
– Why do electron shells contain 2,8,18,32,32,18,8 electrons?
– Why are some elements solid while others are gas or liquid?
– Why does each elements’ persona remain the same irrespective of temperature, pressure or any fields acting on it? Gold is gold and carbon is carbon from absolute zero to 10 million degrees.
– How is the intrinsic property of each element changed so radically by just adding a proton/electron pair?
– The majority of elements in the Periodic Table contain1 or 2 electrons in the outer shell. Why?
– What’s special about Noble elements and why does having 8 electrons in the outer shell make it special?
– Why are atomic spectral line signatures maintained irrespective of temperature/energy?
– Why is Iron(26), the heaviest element to be created in the stellar fusion process in stars and why is it magnetic?
– Using first principles how is a snowflake created and why does it even exist?
There is a very simple answer to all these questions with a paradigm shift in understanding atomic structures; starting with/at Pauli exclusion principle.
I’m so glad I found you and your videos!
I’m a physics teacher and I began to support you on Patreon.
Amazing content.
Hug from Portugal.
In your video General Relativity Explained simply, you state that clocks in the ISS move faster than clocks on the Earth’s surface.
Isn’t that incorrect? I realize there’s a gravitational effect, but overall, don’t they move slower due to their relative velocity?
Dear Arvin Ash,
I remember something of a hand-waved argument that you gave: was it God the rule maker that decided how the universe (that we inhabit) was made or something like 19 physics constants and whatever universe that allows us to exist. Well that might be too big of a question to answer at the moment. But let’s instead, look for a smaller question contained in the bigger question. Might one such be simply if your neutrino’s mass might even be limited by the bounds that you gave. It might greatly simplify Cosmology [not] to have its mass constant. I’ll give an example.
In Carl A. Brannen’s String Theory work he reported two nicely predictive equations of mass:
Electron Family: M.n = Y*( 1 +2^0.5*cos( 2/9 +2*n*pi/3 ))^2 — Y is in any mass units.
Neutrino Family: m.n = y*( 1 +2^0.5*cos( 2/9 +pi/12 +2*n*pi/3 ))^2
He laced everything together with the following assumption:
(Y/y) = (3^11)^2 = 3^22
I like his work. But … that last assumption has just got to be wrong. And what is more important … making it … probably leads directly to the ever growing “force” of Dark Energy.
If you [do not] make that assumption, you do not have to make an infinitely growing force.
You already have a model that is accepted, that any of the Neutrino Family members can turn into any other member. But you are fussy about the transition blink out points when they do that. What if we form the hypothesis that at each blink out point, there is the possibility, of not only transforming one neutrino type into another … but bifurcating at the blink out point into [two] neutrinos. How would anyone ever know since neutrinos are very rarely detected?
It’s easy enough to go back in time to when neutrons, protons and electrons froze out the Cosmic soup. I further have the hypothesis that at that freeze out moment, that the mass of neutrinos was about the same as neutrons. A model Cosmology that has the average mass of the neutrino vary over time, might not only be simple — but explain observed Dark Energy.
The answer to intelligent Alien life is earth based dark matter. Details are on the website, Humanrealitymatrix dot WordPress dot com
Hi,
My name is Jonathan from Israel, I’m 15 years old and I’m interested in Quantum Mechanics.
I saw your video “Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser”, and it was very impressive. I have a question regarding a thought experiment and I hope you can think about it and answer it if you have the time.
The thought experiment :
First, I want to extend the photons’ path to the lower Detectors, let’s say we send it to Mars and back, so that we have enough time to do some changes in the setting of the experiment.
Second, Detector 1 can observe either a wave pattern or a particle one. Now, if it observes a wave pattern, it changes the setting in the setting in the lower mirrors, so that it has a 100% chance of going to one of the two detectors. If Detector 1 detects a particle pattern, it makes it so the photon has a 100% chance to be detected by the eraser(Detector 4).
That will create a contradiction between the current outcome of Detector 1 and the future outcome of the other detectors, and it can not be reconciled because we changed the setting accordingly.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Jonathan.
P.S. I sent it also by email with an attachment.
YO Arvin, you should make a discord server. It is much easier to meet fans and discuss scientific topics.
There is a way to intuitively interpret the physics in a way that makes it easy to understand what’s going on, and also to come up with an experiment that can leave to a gravity propulsion drive. I just wish there was someone to discuss it with.
Hi Mister Ash, I have a question that’s probably high school level even though I’m 65, but I cannot figure this one out:
As I stand on the planet, seeing as I weigh 200 lb.s, it means that gravity is using enough force to pull on me where I stand. Now, let’s use chains to hang a 3,000 lb pallet of cement right over my head. From the ground to the pallet there should be a gravitational field pulling on that pallet. Why am I not being crushed by standing in that field?
Love your videos.
Jigger
Not sure I understand the question. The gravity of the earth is affecting the cement. It is not affecting you, as long as the cement is hung away from you. The weight of the cement is being counteracted by whatever is holding the cement above you. If that rope or whatever it is, wasn’t there, you would indeed be crushed.
I have one available to Patreon members.
The experiment will always be consistent. There is nothing like changing the result.
Yes, you are right. The statement I made was incorrect. The speed of the ISS slows time time a lot more than the time is sped up due to lack of gravity. But either way, the effect is quite small.
Thank you. Glad you find them useful!
Дальше немного подробней разберем, каким образом работать с платформой, поскольку тут имеется ряд специфик, какие требуется учитывать. Поэтому пошагово рассмотрим вопрос активности с платформой, приобретение товаров и их продажу. Независимо от того, зачем вы вошли на hydra ссылка, ресурс затребует регистрации для выполнения операций.
Hi!
I really like your videos. So thanks for them.
I am a science teacher för 7-9 th grade students. And one of them came up with a question I had no god answer for:
“Where do all electrons go?”
I many processes, like a beta emission, there will often be charged particles that just go out in to the universe, and nowhere can you find an answer to what happens with them.
Maybe you can do a video about that?
Regards!
Olof (Sweden)
I watch all of your physics videos as well as those of PBS Space Time. I get quite a bit out of all of them, although often times get a little lost. Anyway, I have a question that may make for a good video. How do matter and anti-matter annihilate? That is, I have often heard that when they come into contact… boom! I have never heard what exactly it is that takes place. How is it that these physical objects immediately convert into pure energy? This seems really magical, if I can use that term, to me. Thanks.
Could you make a video about this
Excited atoms around electron being picture
https://youtu.be/ialegYl3cko
If there is a multiverse, the multiverses all occupy the same place (see double-slit experiment), they virtually exist in one another and our reality depicts this overlap. That would explain why there is a Heisenberg uncertainty relation, since in the microcosm the superposition becomes visible as a “cloud”. Protons are therefore only visible as a “cloud”, which various experiments have proven. As we know today, everything consists of tiny electromagnetic fields, the superposition of these electromagnetic fields, the individual universes manifest the quanta as a 3D superposition and only where statistically the fields of an infinite selection of possibilities overlap sufficiently does the quantum become real. Assuming that an electron is “fixed” in its position from the outside due to a magnetic field, the Planck length differences within the Planck time of the individual universes of the multiverse lead to its manifestation as a “cloud” in our reality , because the electromagnetic fields intensify and extinguish after the superposition known to us. Looking at the position of the electron from a multiverse perspective, the “cloud” is a purely statistical manifestation of the possible positions by superimposing the individual electromagnetic fields of the multiverse, since the Planck length and Planck time limit the deviation of the position from the deterministic center (which in principle is the Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle describes). Since the defining magnetic field is also subject to this deviation, in reality it is no longer possible to approach the deterministic position (Planck length x 2 in 3D space) for this reason. The idea that macroscopic events take place differently in another “reality” is practically impossible (or is the idea that there are parallel worlds in which a macroscopic event has a different result, a non-physical abstraction that does not take place in reality) , since everything becomes deterministic from the microcosm upwards (a macroscopic event is determined on the basis of a previous event and does not allow any deviation above the Planck length and Planck time, since the microscopic superposition of electromagnetic waves of the multiverse represents our reality). The assumption is only valid for constant time direction, but since one can assume that time only runs forward, this is the explanation of our reality and all subatomic phenomena. I just notice that this also explains gravity, the virtual mass (or the weak nuclear force) of the overlapping multiverses is noticeable on an astronomical scale, as gravity. I postulate a universe in which every quantum behaves as a closed multiverse and the encounter of two or more quanta resolves the statistical equation of the individual quanta deterministically with pinpoint accuracy (the wave function collapses) and only on an astronomical scale do the multiversal weak core forces add up to gravitation . Since a simultaneous observation of the subatomic and the astronomical is impossible, but the subatomic multiverse appears to be real and so the reality is in truth the representation of a deterministic multiverse. There is virtually no universe but only the deterministic multiverse in which we live. Example. Each quantum represents a multiverse in our reality, if two quanta intersect these multiverses and this point at which they do it forces the two statistical equations to a common result within the planck time (the same thing happens when you use the photon in the double slit experiment observed, the observation takes place through a further multiversal quantum event, so here two statistical formulas meet again, which are forced to a common result and the wave function collapses). I guess that’s not finished yet, but it connects all 3 theories perfectly (deterministic universe, multiverse and string theory) and can explain gravitation quantitatively.
hi, i am woo from Sweden and i want to explain any thing about “pandemic”. Please ask me 🙂
Hi Arvin : thank for the great videos.
Keep the great coming.
1. My favorite video about Isaac Newton and Principia. My college professor said there was “”” No science before Newton and there has been modifications to Newton for the large (Relativity + Quantum -Mechanics. Is this true or false. My physics book said the foundation of the Natural -sciences was laid by Galileo -Newton. All science was philosophy before Newton. In short, there was science before and science after the Newton.
2. The Newton listed 4- achievements of Newton but the 5- element maybe about the Scientific -Method . How does the Scientific -Method work . How come we need the Scientific -Method.
Is science just performing experiments and publishing the data in journals or web. Perhaps you can do a video on what is the Scientific -Method work and how the Scientific -Method works.
Thank you for all the great video. Keep the great coming.
Why in explanations for time, this does never seem to come up:
I believe time is just movement of Quantum waves, Quark particles,atoms or such, no movement no time. The one proof i think is that nothing in temperature can reach absolute zero, as at absolute zero nothing would move, therefore time would stop, which i believe is impossible to stop time. Please give me what you think on this, as i am very inquisitive about these things!
Dear Arvin, you really do a great job explaining the more difficult theories in such a way that they are easy or at least interesting to analise. I’m an electric engineer and I would like you to explain magnetic field from the QED frame. Faraday’s explanation is a little bit dogmatic, at least as it is taught in school. Thanks and keep making science available for everybody!
Hi Arvin,
I recently saw your video about consciousness creating reality using the electron double slit experiment. While I have read about this in the past, the biggest insight for me there was that if you keep the observation apparatus – ie. if you keep shining the light to detect “which slit”, but do not observe anything, so let the photons interact with the electrons but still do not keep that information anywhere, we will see the interference. Is my understanding accurate?
My previous understanding was that hitting the electrons with photons for detection basically collapses their wave function, but what you suggest is that that is okay. Its when you try to store than information somehow (like you showed through that paper), that is when the collapse happens. This is way deeper than my superficial understanding!
Please help clarify. It was not given enough time in your video.
Does blackhoes reach infinitely small before time stops. Like an event horizon, there should be some point where time will not allow anything else to happen, so you never reach infinity.
I visualize the letter A
The ^ of the letter is the black hole, and the horizontal horizontal line to complete the letter “A” is a plate (man hole cover) where time stops.
We can call it an A-Hole vs a Black Hole
Your thoughts ?
Hello,
I feel that the behavior of the double slit experiments are related to the phase velocity of a wavefront exceeding the group velocity. Like a trumpet with it’s valves – only certain harmonics will be sustained in the instant that the valves are configured. The harmonic pattern is revealed once the trumpet is energized. The slits and detectors are tuning elements similar to the trumpet valves.
Hi, I was looking at the Alcubierre drive, the guy is correct to 50%, missing one small detail.
At or faster the the speed of light, the warp zone in front and in the back of the spaceship are not like a wave, it has to be 360 degrees, so a observer looking at the spaceship going away from him would see circular void and someone looking at the spaceship coming at him would also see nothing until the spaceship stops in front of him. A wormhole works the same way, it s a deformation of the space time. You basically fall in your own artificial void, think out of the box, you cannot create a wormhole and go in it like a portal like in IronMan, you create it around the ship, and then you decide where you go, you travel with your own energy. A lot more efficient and no risk of being thorn apart by (gravity = Sapce/time). You know those things you call blackhole well that is where most of the called Dark Matter of your universe is, out of your spacetime but it is there that’s why it’s not accounted for in your calculation. Great work keep going.
Hi, thank you for all interesting Information contents. Could you please help to understand the following (am no Physicist, only a lay man):
One of the law of motion says, unless external force is applied, the motion is continued (or state of rest). But, how to explain movement without interaction (self or with environment). Ie, if something is moving, it’s spending or gaining energy. So it is either in deficiency or surplus which make it move. Even If there is no external influence, can’t the deficiency / loss of energy by movement itself happen? So there is no inertia as such??? Ie, Spontaneity is not natural (in case of resting object). Also, my mere definition itself / observing etc – can this be an influence? Ie, to say an object, I must become subject & this sets a design & probable influence???
As mentioned, am layman & if it’s a stupid question, please furnish explanation even then also. 🤭🙏
Many thanks & best regards
I need to ask something there is no one around to ask happy if you just can aswer
1. Since the Mass of the balckhole is enough to consume time and light, It is not possible for a black hole to move in the space and time
2. Than black holes can not have an orbit or can not move in our universe
3. The movement activities observed on blackholes on space and time are not the black holes movements but the movement of the universe itself.
4. The black hole is stabile unless not cought in a force of a equal powered mass such as another black hole, if so it is will it give a clue of the exact direction of the expanding way of universe when the shrinking is exclused caused by black hole at the specific area on space and time.
Arvin,
I just watched your video on Bob lazar it was short fast and to the point loved it! It would be great if you can do a similar one with “Stan Meyer” mostly known for his “water fuel cell” and water driven dune buggy that was shown back in the 80’s. I have been following his works for many years some of his claims are reproducible others I haven’t seen a successful reproduction. He was interviewed in a documentary “it runs on water”
Hi Arvin
Can you (have you already) make a video on rotating black holes? (Most of the videos on youtube are about non rotating ones.
Thank you
Arvin, Great work. I’ve been watching your site on and off for a while now and I love and appreciate the way you present complicated topics. I would like to see more under life lessons I’m interested in this subject and I may even try and write a book about it someday. Also in the technology section I would be interested in hearing your thoughts on what is the best technology combination for a person. I know there can be many solutions but, do you have a recommendation on a phone or perhaps what the phone settings should be should I only take calls from people I know do you use a tablet do you use more than one tablet is there a cheap tablet style notepad that I can use to transfer thoughts and notes to a just a scratch board or writing board and back again to my tablet so that I don’t take my expensive tablet shopping with me. What’s the best combination of email and video set ups should I have more than one email address should I segment them for different purposes do you recommend dropping the standard television channels in favor of just using various streaming services what are the best ones what do you recommend should I get the with ads or without ads and so on and so on and so on. I would love to hear your thoughts on the best technology configuration for the average person. Thank you very much for your work I think you have taught me a lot and I will be watching for future installments I have already signed up for your newsletter. My degrees are in computer science, and information science and education. Paul
I would like to know if there is a scientific way to test whether our Big Bang produced two universes: One primarily of matter and the other, primarily of anti-matter? Is it mathematically possible that there could have been a bit more matter than anti-matter or is this just the most educated guess? OK for Arvin Ash to email me on this, if it captures his interest. (OK to give out my email and my website.)
I just watched your video on the “Delayed Choice” experiment where you showed how a decision made in the “future” influenced a result in the past. You were using entangled photons. Photons do not experience time the way we do. In terms of itself, a photon arrives at its destination at the same time it is emitted, no matter how far away that is. What the experiment proved was that entangled photons are entangled in time as well as space. The future did not influence or change the past. For photons, there is no such thing as the future or the past.
GR attempts to explain gravity as a curvature of space time. QM wants to explain it as an exchange of Gravitons [a Boson] The 2 theories are of course not compatible at present
But since nothing can escape a Black hole, including light, a Boson, wouldn’t a graviton, also a Boson not be able to escape the horizon as well?
In which case no extreme gravitational attraction could be felt?
Doesn’t this prove the GR interpretation correct, and not the QM interpretation?
Thanks Bill